Philosophy 363

THIS IS A DRAFT. EVERYTHING CAN CHANGE.

My office is Stevenson 341. My email is . My office hours for this term are TBA and by appointment. The course webpage is http://www.davidsanson.com/363.

Course Description

The title of this course is “Topics in Metaphysics and Epistemology.” Each time I teach it, I choose a different topic to focus on. This term, our focus will be on truth and reality.

What is truth? What are truths? How is truth related to meaning? Is moral truth the same kind of thing as scientific truth? What is reality? What does it mean to be a realist or an anti-realist? Can something be true for me but not true for you? Can something be real for me but not real for you? Can truth outstrip reality? How is truth related to fiction? How is fiction related to reality? And what to say about sentences like, ‘this sentence is not true’?

Books

I have not yet decided whether or not to order books for this course.

The literature on truth and reality is huge. You are also encouraged to search for books and articles on topics that catch your interest. A good place to start is [PhilPapers.org][].

Assignments

Your grade will be based upon

Homework exercises will be assigned occasionally throughout the term as appropriate and graded pass/fail. “Levels papers” are explained in detail below. The final paper will be a longer paper on a topic of your choice, determined in consultation with me.

Participation

This will be a small discussion based class. It is essential that everyone participates. This means that you must come to each class, and you need to come to each class prepared. Before each class you need to do the reading and think about it.

Levels Papers1

The “levels papers” are modeled after video game mechanics. There are three levels for you to progress through, and you are allowed to progress to the next level only after you have completed the previous level. Just as with levels in video games, the idea here is to insure that you are always working on a task that is challenging enough to be interesting, but not so challenging that it is frustrating. Each of the levels will help prepare you to write the final paper for the course (writing the final paper is kind of like the “boss battle” for this course).

Your “levels grade” is determined by how far you progress through the levels. You have a maximum of five attempts at the levels, each due on a specific day (see schedule). After attempting a level, you will receive one of four evaluations: “not much progress”, “good effort”, “almost”, or “complete”. Each attempt must be written on one of the readings covered since the last attempt was due (hence, each attempt will be on a new topic—you will not be rewriting the previous attempt). Your levels grade will be determined by how far through the levels you progress, and which evaluation you get on the last level you attempt, according to the following scale:

Level 3
Complete = A, Almost = A-, Good Effort = B+, Not much progress = B
Level 2
Complete = B-, Almost = C+, Good Effort = C, Not much progress = C-
Level 1
Complete = D, Almost = D-, Good Effort = F, Not much progress = F

The complete instructions for each level are as follows:

Level 1. Expository paper, between 150 and 300 words. Choose one particular argument from the readings and explain that argument in a very short paper. We will be doing some exercises during the first couple of weeks of class that will prepare you to write this paper.

Level 2. Expository paper, between 400 and 600 words. This paper will be just like level 1, except that you will explain two arguments from the reading that have some important relationship to one another. For example, you might choose to discuss an argument and then another argument that is an objection to the first. Alternatively, you might choose a second argument that builds on the first argument. There are other possibilities as well — the only requirement is that the two came from the readings and have some interesting relationship to one another. (When you write your paper, you should make it clear just what the relationship is.) As this paper now has a bit of complexity, make sure to include an introductory paragraph that briefly explains what your paper is going to be about and how it will proceed.

Level 3. Expository and critical paper, between 700 and 1000 words. This will be just like level 2, except that you will also argue that one of the arguments you discuss is unsound (i.e., that it either has a false premise or a bad inference). Your criticism here must be original, and you should be sure to defend your criticism against potential objections.

You have a maximum of five attempts at the levels. The deadlines for those five attempts are:

Attempt 1
Feb 17th
Attempt 2
March 3rd
Attempt 3
March 24th
Attempt 4
April 11th
Attempt 5
May 2nd

Course Website

Getting in Touch

Email is the best way to reach me when I am not in my office. I am not always online and I cannot always respond immediately. If I have not responded in 24 hours please email me again, letting me know it is your second email (I won’t take this as harassment). Include “363” in the subject line of your email and your full name somewhere in the body of your email, so I know who you are(!), and that the email is related to this class.

Disabilities

Any student needing to arrange a reasonable accommodation for a documented disability should contact Disability Concerns at 350 Fell Hall, 309‐438‐5853, http://www.disabilityconcerns.ilstu.edu.

Other Sources of Support

Life at college can get very complicated. Students sometimes feel overwhelmed, lost, experience anxiety or depression, struggle with relationship difficulties or diminished self-esteem. Many of these issues can be effectively addressed with a little help. Student Counseling Services (SCS) helps students cope with difficult emotions and life stressors. Student Counseling Services is staffed by experienced, professional psychologists and counselors, who are attuned to the needs of college students. The services are free and completely confidential. Find out more at http://counseling.illinoisstate.edu or by calling 309-438-3655.

Academic Misconduct

Academic integrity is expected and required. Students are expected to be honest in all academic work. A student’s placement of his or her name on any academic exercise shall be regarded as assurance that the work is the result of the student’s own thought, effort, and study.

If you have questions, refer to the Code of Student Conduct, B1 (Academic Integrity), which outlines unacceptable behaviors in academic matters, or talk to me. In certain circumstances (such as cheating or plagiarism) I may be required to refer a student to Community Rights & Responsibilities for a violation of Illinois State University’s Code of Student Conduct.


  1. I borrow the “levels system” (and much of the following description) from Dustin Locke.